typed objects and value types

[Domenic Denicola]

I really appreciate you guys making === (not just ==) work for value types. I think that drastically improves the usability compared to earlier proposals.

I can see Andreas's concerns regarding what that means for their object-ness though. But hopefully that can be worked out while still keeping a useful ===.

From: Niko Matsakis<mailto:niko at alum.mit.edu>
Sent: ?Wednesday?, ?April? ?2?, ?2014 ?07?:?32
To: es-discuss<mailto:es-discuss at mozilla.org>

I just wanted to let people on es-discuss know about two of my recent
blog posts concerning typed objects. The first is a kind of status
report:

http://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/blog/2014/04/01/typed-objects-status-report/

and the second details some (preliminary) thoughts on how one could
build on typed objects to support user-defined value types:

http://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/blog/2014/04/01/value-types-in-javascript/




Niko
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss at mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20140402/4ec89840/attachment.html>