Comments on Sept Meeting Notes
Mark S. Miller
erights at google.com
Fri Sep 27 08:54:42 PDT 2013
So a more polite answer is: communicating registered symbols between
machines, with the same semantics as communicating them over a bit channel
within the same address space. I can't use structured clone between
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Mark S. Miller <erights at google.com> wrote:
> The structured cloning algorithm is the last thing I want to use to
> communicate between workers. I advise avoiding it like the plague, instead
> serializing to JSON, sending the string, and unserializing on the other
> side. This also keeps the semantics of inter-worker communication aligned
> with the semantics of distributed inter-machine messaging.
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk at annevk.nl>wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock
>> <allen at wirfs-brock.com> wrote:
>> > The use case was actually suggested in a response to dherman earlier in
>> this thread when he mentioned sharing symbols between workers.
>> We don't need to expose that to user-script though. That would be part
>> of the structured cloning algorithm.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss