Comments on Sept Meeting Notes

Rick Waldron waldron.rick at gmail.com
Thu Sep 26 15:13:27 PDT 2013


On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Erik Arvidsson <erik.arvidsson at gmail.com>wrote:

> No surprise here, but I also support using "@" methods.


I don't. Please see my response to Kevin Smith:
https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2013-September/033720.html


I'm also in
> favor of making methods non enumerable by default. This makes them
> more consistent with what we have in ES today.


That might be the case for methods defined on prototypes of built-in
objects, but it's absolutely not the case for user land code. Please see
the examples in my previous response to Allen:
https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2013-September/033725.html

Rick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130926/7d01d18a/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list