Comments on Sept Meeting Notes
waldron.rick at gmail.com
Thu Sep 26 15:13:27 PDT 2013
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Erik Arvidsson <erik.arvidsson at gmail.com>wrote:
> No surprise here, but I also support using "@" methods.
I don't. Please see my response to Kevin Smith:
I'm also in
> favor of making methods non enumerable by default. This makes them
> more consistent with what we have in ES today.
That might be the case for methods defined on prototypes of built-in
objects, but it's absolutely not the case for user land code. Please see
the examples in my previous response to Allen:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss