[[Invoke]] and implicit method calls
andre.bargull at udo.edu
Thu Sep 19 06:40:23 PDT 2013
Back to option 2: Redesign [[Invoke]] from
> What if we made invoke take either an identifier to call, or a got
> function to call? Then get+invoke would pass the "got" function.
> Allen Wirfs-Brock <mailto:allen at wirfs-brock.com>
> September 19, 2013 1:39 PM
> Seems very unlikely. The @@hasInstance access is new so it isn't a
> backwards compat issue. BTW, these are static counts. For example, a
> typical call to ToPrimitive will only make a single such conditional
> Arguably allowing a String or Number wrapper to be transparently
> proxied and hence work like a unproxied wrapper WRT ToPrimitive is one
> the reasons we need to do this.
More information about the es-discuss