Promises: final steps

Anne van Kesteren annevk at annevk.nl
Sun Sep 8 10:06:19 PDT 2013


(Added back the other lists.)

On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Brendan Eich <brendan at secure.meer.net> wrote:
> Let's put done back in. It's the right thing.

Given what has been said thus far
https://github.com/domenic/promises-unwrapping/issues/19 my
inclination is still to leave it out initially and give a version
without done() six months to a year to mature. Not having done() can
make promises harder to debug in the short term, but adding done() is
trivial to do later. And given the lack of native promise
implementations to date there's no way for us to test the done()-less
design without trying it first.


-- 
http://annevankesteren.nl/


More information about the es-discuss mailing list