Promises: final steps
Tab Atkins Jr.
jackalmage at gmail.com
Wed Sep 4 11:35:03 PDT 2013
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Kevin Smith <zenparsing at gmail.com> wrote:
> This looks like good work. I like the name "cast" in particular, as I can
> imagine a future casting operator which provides sugar for the cast function
> defined on a constructor.
> The only concern I have is over error-swallowing. What's the approach for
> this minimal API?
As far as I know, the current plan is still that devtools should
handle swallowed exceptions, since we got rid of .done() some time
ago. Plans may have changed without me knowing, though!
More information about the es-discuss