(Request/propose) license change

musicdenotation at gmail.com musicdenotation at gmail.com
Tue Sep 3 23:37:00 PDT 2013


What do you mean by a post with only "Nope"?

-----------
To Ecma International: Release the ECMAScript specification under Creative Commons Attribution 1.0+ / Open Web Foundation License 0.8+


---Original message---
From: Brendan Eich
Sent: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 08:28:39 -0700
To: musicdenotation at gmail.com
Subject: Re: (Request/propose) license change


> musicdenotation at gmail.com <mailto:musicdenotation at gmail.com>
> September 3, 2013 8:15 AM
> The first post was to outline the issue. I had to repost many times to gain attention and explain and suggest solutions.

Nope.

/be
>
> To Ecma International: Release the ECMAScript specification under Creative Commons Attribution 1.0+ / Open Web Foundation License 0.8+
>
>
> ---Original message---
> From: Brendan Eich
> Sent: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 18:56:22 -0700
> To: musicdenotation at gmail.com
> Subject: Re: (Request/propose) license change
>
>
>> musicdenotation at gmail.com<mailto:musicdenotation at gmail.com>
>> September 2, 2013 6:35 PM
>> First, I should not have changed the thread's name. That mail I wrote
>> on a keypad mobile phone in a hurry, and so I was too
>> lazy to write the entire original thread's name.
>> Second, I have no plan to distribute the specification outside of the
>> current license's scope. I am doing that as part of the
>> JavaScript/ECMAScript community. It certainly sound


More information about the es-discuss mailing list