ES6 draft, Rev20 is now available
andrea.giammarchi at gmail.com
Wed Oct 30 11:00:20 PDT 2013
This is promoting a fix in the `Object.prototype` ... and since I believe
those dark days where `Object.prototype` shouldn't be touched due for/in
loops, I like it ^_^
Or maybe it's just a matter of `Arguments.prototype` , the most common non
iterable always converted via slice?
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.com> wrote:
> Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Brendan Eich<brendan at mozilla.com>
>>> > Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>>> >> This is different from how sequence<T> behaves in IDL. (It uses
>>>> >> array-likes.) :/
>>> > This is more general, since array-likes should be iterable to be like
>>> > arrays, which are iterable.
>>> > So this seems ok. Right?
>> An array-like only "length" and properties "0", "1", ... as far as I
>> know. I thought iterable meant they implement the iterator protocol.
> The meaning of array-like is evolving, maybe. I know, this means old
> array-likes don't iterate without work. Temporary migration problem?
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss