Novel operator syntax

André Bargull andre.bargull at udo.edu
Tue Oct 29 12:07:12 PDT 2013


On 10/29/2013 7:51 PM, Tristan Zajonc wrote:
> Right you are. That was the same issue with Python.  Are there any
> blockers to ~*?
>

There are the usual ASI problems. For example this is currently valid:
```
a
~+ b
```

It is parsed as:
```
a;
~+ b;
```


>
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:46 AM, André Bargull <andre.bargull at udo.edu
> <mailto:andre.bargull at udo.edu>> wrote:
>
>         Got it, thanks. We could indeed do .+, .*, etc. without ambiguity.
>         (Ignore E4X's wildcards: xml.* etc.!)
>
>         /be
>
>
>     No.  ;-)
>
>     js> 1.*2
>     2
>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list