Novel operator syntax
dean at deanlandolt.com
Tue Oct 29 11:34:39 PDT 2013
The PEP Tristan posted offers a pretty compelling case for distinguishing
elementwise operators from objectwise ones (although not for this dot
syntax per se, they went with a ~-prefix):
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.com> wrote:
> Tristan Zajonc wrote:
>> Sorry, at most I'm only proposing every *existing* operator prefixed by
>> ., not new operators. So things like
>> .+, ./, .*, .-., .%, .==, .!=, .>, .<, etc. These would be called dot
>> operators. This is all that's required by the
>> technical computing use case.
> Why is the dot needed, though?
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss