Proposal to simplify Generators impact

Lucio Tato luciotato at
Sun Oct 27 05:38:56 PDT 2013

OK. Now I've read the email threads (didn't found them the first time).
Now I understand why.

On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at> wrote:

> Yup.
> Look (Licio), we've been over this many times, recorded here in es-discuss
> (directly in posts and in TC39 meeting notes). We are not adding generator
> syntax lightly. It is necessary to preserve backward compatibility.
> /be
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list