Making the identifier identification strawman less restrictive

Mathias Bynens mathias at
Tue Oct 22 04:33:17 PDT 2013

On 14 Oct 2013, at 23:21, Erik Arvidsson <erik.arvidsson at> wrote:

> I'm concerned about the latest version of this on the wiki. The
> edition parameter requires that we ship 2 tables today. This seems
> like it might change to 3 in ES7 and n in ES(n+4). I think the only
> reasonable requirement is that it matches what the engine actually
> uses. For tools it seems better for them to include this table. I
> don't want all runtimes to have to pay for something that only tools
> need.

This strawman is only useful for tools. If tools need to implement this themselves, this basically means the strawman is rejected, right?

More information about the es-discuss mailing list