andrea.giammarchi at gmail.com
Sun Oct 13 01:40:22 PDT 2013
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.com> wrote:
> However, Russell's counter-argument that fallback in older browsers to
> loading lots of little files, request by request, from the server directory
> hierarchy, may be too painful, reducing the value as a migration technique.
this is what happens today with external CDN scripts and/or AMD like
solutions regardless ... if these are not bundled all together, isn't it?
Is there a way for old browsers that avoids a request storm, and which can
> be expressed entirely in the hosted content (no protocol stack update
hacking HTML SCRIPT prototype upfront, it's possible to improve the
behavior but hard to make it fully able to ignore network requests.
However, this is not usually the main concern for new/recent proposals so I
wonder why it is in such specific case?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss