jorge at jorgechamorro.com
Fri Oct 11 00:54:12 PDT 2013
On 11/10/2013, at 03:10, Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
> Last personal thought: this is way nicer than any AMD solution I've seen, giving a real alternative to async modules too via script defer/async attributes without requiring boiler plates all over to include on demand.
Because all the files in the .zip would appear to be 'local', a synchronous require() can be built on top of that, and suddenly we'd have almost 100% node-style modules compatibility in browsers. Or am I missing something?
( Jorge )();
More information about the es-discuss