FYI: Ecma-404 approved and published

Rick Waldron waldron.rick at gmail.com
Tue Oct 8 14:57:04 PDT 2013


On Tuesday, October 8, 2013, Mark S. Miller wrote:

> JSON must not change. If it refers to "the latest Unicode, whatever that
> is", then it is potentially subject to disruption by (admittedly unlikely)
> future changes to Unicode.
>

I had a draft that said this, but Mark's arrived before I sent, so I'm
giving the obnoxious +1 ;)

Rick


>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Mathias Bynens <mathias at qiwi.be<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'mathias at qiwi.be');>
> > wrote:
>
>> On 8 Oct 2013, at 22:19, Rick Waldron <waldron.rick at gmail.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'waldron.rick at gmail.com');>>
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Mathias Bynens <mathias at qiwi.be<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'mathias at qiwi.be');>>
>> wrote:
>> > > As for Unicode, it explicitly refers to Unicode 6.2.0, even though
>> version 6.3.0 was released last week.
>> >
>> > The document was written in July, which was before last week.
>>
>> No need to get snarky.
>>
>> Why not just refer to http://www.unicode.org/versions/latest/, i.e. the
>> latest available Unicode version? The version number doesn’t really matter
>> for JSON as all it cares about is the concept of “code points”, the range
>> of which is fixed.
>>
>> Sorry for not raising this earlier, I must’ve missed the call for
>> feedback in/before July.
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
>> 'es-discuss at mozilla.org');>
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>
>
>
> --
>     Cheers,
>     --MarkM
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20131008/c2c4c8aa/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list