FYI: Ecma-404 approved and published

Mark S. Miller erights at google.com
Tue Oct 8 14:39:19 PDT 2013


JSON must not change. If it refers to "the latest Unicode, whatever that
is", then it is potentially subject to disruption by (admittedly unlikely)
future changes to Unicode.


On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Mathias Bynens <mathias at qiwi.be> wrote:

> On 8 Oct 2013, at 22:19, Rick Waldron <waldron.rick at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Mathias Bynens <mathias at qiwi.be> wrote:
> > > As for Unicode, it explicitly refers to Unicode 6.2.0, even though
> version 6.3.0 was released last week.
> >
> > The document was written in July, which was before last week.
>
> No need to get snarky.
>
> Why not just refer to http://www.unicode.org/versions/latest/, i.e. the
> latest available Unicode version? The version number doesn’t really matter
> for JSON as all it cares about is the concept of “code points”, the range
> of which is fixed.
>
> Sorry for not raising this earlier, I must’ve missed the call for feedback
> in/before July.
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>



-- 
    Cheers,
    --MarkM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20131008/ccf22f12/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list