Object.mixin, why just for enumerables (?)
andrea.giammarchi at gmail.com
Thu Oct 3 11:24:18 PDT 2013
I was talking about concrete and usable implementation of those specs.
Updates and contribution always welcome, of course.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen at wirfs-brock.com>wrote:
> No, the closest yo a spec that we have is the spec
> Andrea Giammarchi <andrea.giammarchi at gmail.com> wrote:
> this is the closest to specs we have today:
> it does copy all own descriptors so it's suitable for almost everything
> you need but `Symbols` (in any case absent in ES5)
> That being said, it will be compatible with my `Symbol`
> proposal/shim/polyfill if used.
> But I am not testing, neither suggesting, to use the latter one if not
> truly needed and not through `Object.mixin`
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 6:29 AM, medikoo <medikoo+mozilla.org at medikoo.com>wrote:
>> > It's a copy-paste error in the draft:
>> > https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1999#c1
>> Great news. Thanks!
>> Sorry for noise.
>> View this message in context:
>> Sent from the Mozilla - ECMAScript 4 discussion mailing list archive at
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss