Introduction, comprehensions beyond arrays

Jason Orendorff jason.orendorff at
Thu May 16 08:31:31 PDT 2013

On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Brendan Eich <brendan at> wrote:

> André Bargull wrote:
>> No one wants arguments in arrows.
>>> The question is, should an outer arguments binding be visible? I think
>>> so, now that Jason raises the question.
>> This is a different position from [1], isn't it? The notes from January
>> [2] as well as [3] might be of interest, too.
> Thanks for the reminder -- I should have remembered this.
> My appeal to arguments.callee was kind of a torture-test for why arrow
> bodies should not be strict by fiat. But it shouldn't prevail if we think
> "expression TCP" is more valuable. I'd be interested in Jason's thoughts
> here.

No strong opinion. "Expression TCP" is nice, but not very valuable.

Assuming we do not want `arguments` bindings in arrows, I guess using
arguments in an arrow is almost certainly a mistake and should be a

We shouldn't be motivated either way by a desire to support

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list