Introduction, comprehensions beyond arrays
andre.bargull at udo.edu
Sat May 11 01:30:28 PDT 2013
> >/ I see that I have a TODO note in 10.5.3 that says "don't create an
> />/ arguments binding for arrow functions". However, I'm not sure that we
> />/ actually had consensus on that point.
> We never had an alternative that I know of. The wiki went further and
> said 'arguments' is an error; this was based on meeting feedback.
> >/ I'm with you on in thinking that arrows shouldn't rebind arguments
> />/ but I think there may have been some push back on that.
> No one wants arguments in arrows.
> The question is, should an outer arguments binding be visible? I think
> so, now that Jason raises the question.
This is a different position from , isn't it? The notes from January
 as well as  might be of interest, too.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss