B.3.1 The __proto__ pseudo property

Mark Miller erights at gmail.com
Wed May 8 08:31:00 PDT 2013


What about your triangle argument?

  Cheers
  --MarkM

On May 8, 2013, at 7:53 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen at wirfs-brock.com> wrote:

> 
> On May 8, 2013, at 12:01 AM, Andreas Rossberg wrote:
> 
>> On 8 May 2013 07:10, Mark Miller <erights at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> What would be gained by
>>> moving the property alone to Annex B? If nothing, then I think this
>>> consistency should win.
>> 
>> JavaScript implementations in new or existing eco systems that are not
>> poisoned by web legacy wouldn't be obliged to support it. It's the
>> difference between acknowledging web reality and forcing web reality
>> on everybody.
> 
> +1
> 
> The object literal special form could go either place.  I think the O.p properties should be in Annex B and I'm fine with also placing the object literal __proto__ special form there too, based on a consistency argument.
> 
> Allen
> 


More information about the es-discuss mailing list