Module naming and declarations
kosmo.zb at gmail.com
Tue May 7 14:45:25 PDT 2013
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk at annevk.nl> wrote:
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <samth at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk at annevk.nl> wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <samth at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>>>> 0. If we have an absolute URL, skip steps 1-3.
>>> How do you define this? We currently do not have this concept really.
>>> You could parse and compare if the serialization is equivalent I
>>> suppose, but even that would fail to detect certain cases, such as
>>> http://test/test\test ... Or http:test which is an absolute URL in
>>> theory, but treated identical to "test" if the base URL's scheme is
>> If it's a URI, then it's treated this way. That is, if it starts
>> 'scheme:' for some scheme.
> I think what you're failing to understand is that there's no concept
> as "if it's a URI" within the context of the web platform, so I'm
> asking how you'd thought about going about defining that new concept.
What URLs remain the same after relative resolution against any other URL?
> Maybe seeing what I meant in action will help:
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
More information about the es-discuss