Module naming and declarations
rossberg at google.com
Tue May 7 12:10:57 PDT 2013
On 7 May 2013 20:49, Kevin Smith <zenparsing at gmail.com> wrote:
>> If module names were URLs, that would definitely be the right thing.
>> Module names aren't URLs, though. These aren't static links to static
>> locations (for reasons discussed in this thread; e.g., it'd be
>> counterproductive for backbone.js to have a static URL for underscore
>> embedded in it).
> Well, they're not URLs *except* when they are URLs - that's the problem.
Sam, Jason, I'm sorry, but I really can't follow your line of
reasoning on this. Aren't you just papering over a problem by defining
it away with convenient wording?
More information about the es-discuss