derhoermi at gmx.net
Wed May 1 08:06:48 PDT 2013
* Jonas Sicking wrote:
>Then there's of course the issue of what we should do with APIs that
>combine several Futures into a single one. Like Future.every() etc.
>Similarly, there's also the issue of what to do with chaining.
>I'm tempted to say that if you create combined or dependent Futures,
>you still only have the ability to cancel them through the original
And the "progress" of multiple "Futures" can only be observed through
the individual "ProgressFuture" objects? I would expect the opposite.
Similarily, I would expect to be able to mix "ProgressFuture" objects
with other "Future" objects, and still be able to observe "progress"
of the combination. And if I can do that, I would also expect that I
can turn a single "Future" into a "ProgressFuture" in this sense, but
then the whole "subclassing" idea kinda breaks down, why bother with
that. And "cancelation" does not seem quite so different from "pro-
gress" in this sense.
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern at hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
More information about the es-discuss