Machine readable specifications

Wes Garland wes at
Fri Mar 22 05:57:54 PDT 2013

On 22 March 2013 08:41, gaz Heyes <gazheyes at> wrote:
> You wouldn't do that, you'd point them to the human readable form. The
> machine version is specifically designed to be read by machines with low
> overhead to update functionality without touching code.

Is there a formalized way to translate between the human and
machine-readable specifications?  If they are found to have different
meanings (not hard to imagine), which specification would be
considered authoritative?

Wesley W. Garland
Director, Product Development
PageMail, Inc.
+1 613 542 2787 x 102

More information about the es-discuss mailing list