Comments on “Making Built-in Objects Subclassable”

Herby Vojčík herby at mailbox.sk
Mon Mar 18 04:47:35 PDT 2013



Herby Vojčík wrote:
>
>
> Axel Rauschmayer wrote:
>> A few more thoughts:
>>
>> - This marks the end of prototypal inheritance in JavaScript (not
>> complaining, just stating a fact). Putting @@create in constructors C
>> makes a lot of sense, but it could, in principle, also be put into
>> instance prototypes C.prototype. Then Object.create(proto) could use
>> @@create to create the instance whose prototype is proto.
>
> The identifier create is probably used in lots of other places, so this
> is non-starter, but if not, it could be simply reused, so that:
>
> Ctr.create(proto, [descriptors])
>
> does
>
> newobj = Ctr[@@create]();
> newobj.__proto__ = proto;
> Object.defineProperties(newobj, descriptors);

Sorry for replying to myself, but another possibility is to add proto 
and descriptors parameters to IIRC parameterless @@create. Object.create 
would thus just point to Object[@@create] and others could be create 
similarly: Array[@@create](myprototype, mydescriptors);

> It is semantically compatible with what Object.create does now.
> In fact, if somewhere inside implementation of Object.create one would
> use "this[@@create]" to create new instance, and it was moved to
> Function.prototype, it could be used as is.
>
>> Axel
>
> Herby


More information about the es-discuss mailing list