instantiating generators

Allen Wirfs-Brock allen at
Fri Mar 15 13:22:09 PDT 2013

On Mar 15, 2013, at 1:18 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock
> <allen at> wrote:
>> On Mar 15, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Axel Rauschmayer wrote:
>>> I would prefer having to use `new` (but don’t have strong feelings about
>>> it): generators are more like constructors than like functions. When I first
>>> started experimenting with them in Firefox, it took me a while to figure
>>> that out (even though it is obvious in hindsight). With `new`, I’d probably
>>> have figured it out quicker.
>> My experience was similar.
> Mine's the opposite - my experience with generators in Python built up
> a strong and very natural-feeling intuition that a generator was just
> a function that returned a "magic list".  Trying to push that into a
> constructor notion would feel awkward.
> Actually using it would be even more awkward than thinking about it, I
> believe.  For example, I use the enumerate() generator *all the time*
> in Python.  Having to always write:
>    for(x of new enumerate(seq)) {...}
> would feel really weird, even if you changed the conjugation of the
> function to "enumeration()".

Agree that requiring new would be ackward. But permitting it seems reasonable.


> ~TJ

More information about the es-discuss mailing list