Jan 30 TC39 Meeting Notes
waldron.rick at gmail.com
Sun Mar 10 21:57:27 PDT 2013
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Angus Croll <anguscroll at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for this Rick.
> From the minutes, I'm not getting the rationale for banishing let/const
> from sloppy mode.
Are you specifically asking about my "big spiel"? I stated that disallowing
any new syntax (not just let/const) in non-strict mode would result in
stunted adoption and "too many rules" confusion. Despite my belief that
strict mode is the right mode, I also asserted that it's simply unrealistic
to think that new syntax is a big enough carrot.
Important to note that I'm not speaking for anyone that reads or
participates on this list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss