Super-references

Axel Rauschmayer axel at rauschma.de
Sat Mar 9 00:20:59 PST 2013


The question I tried to answer was:

> Now, how transpilers are going to solve Object.mixin super call? 'cause once again, that should be solved runtime and I am curious, without caller, how transpilers are thinking to solve that.


I assumed you didn’t know, which is why I wrote an answer.



On Mar 9, 2013, at 8:14 , Andrea Giammarchi <andrea.giammarchi at gmail.com> wrote:

> I CAN find super via this, the qwhole point about caller since this morning was about the fact I could do stuff I cannot do anymore.
> 
> That said, in 2010:
> http://webreflection.blogspot.com/2010/01/javascript-super-bullshit.html
> 
> late 2009 wrote early 2010:
> http://webreflection.blogspot.com/2010/01/better-javascript-classes.html
> 
> And benchmark about all this in February 2009:
> http://webreflection.blogspot.com/2009/02/on-javascript-inheritance-performance.html
> 
> So, just in case, have an extra look too on what developers wrote before your blog did, thank you.
> 
> Thanks for your examples in any case.

-- 
Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
axel at rauschma.de

home: rauschma.de
twitter: twitter.com/rauschma
blog: 2ality.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130309/2bc41565/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list