Array#sort() implementations not interoperable

Andreas Rossberg rossberg at
Fri Jun 14 01:30:52 PDT 2013

On 14 June 2013 10:17, David Bruant <bruant.d at> wrote:
> I'm suggesting to make the [[Get]], [[Put]] and [[Delete]] sequence less
> implementation-dependent which means at least to bound them to the maximum
> of what is needed. That's a gain especially in the presence of getter/setter
> and proxies (where an impl-dependent sequence can lead to more calls than
> necessary).

I don't see much of a use case for an array with getters, let alone
sorting a proxy. So the practical gain seems negligible.


More information about the es-discuss mailing list