Why can’t for-of be applied to iterators?
brendan at mozilla.com
Wed Jun 12 17:28:35 PDT 2013
Andreas Rossberg wrote:
> Yes, I said earlier that I wouldn't
> mind dropping the implicit magic altogether, but that isn't what the
> current subthread is about, where I suggested another alternative,
> which is (somewhat) simplifying the current model by viewing @iterator
> as an implicit conversion. That doesn't imply any of the above.
Somehow I'm missing one of your messages -- sorry about that (fetching
mail on a phone sometimes leaves it unfiltered in my Inbox).
But I've argued against "viewing @iterator as an implicit conversion",
and so has Claude, so I think we are going around the block again.
More information about the es-discuss