Re: Why can’t for-of be applied to iterators?
erik.arvidsson at gmail.com
Mon Jun 10 16:52:45 PDT 2013
We really need to be able to do for-of with arrays and node lists etc,
without having to call .values() on it. It is such a common operation that
we should not tax this further.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Andy Wingo <wingo at igalia.com> wrote:
> On Sun 09 Jun 2013 11:34, Jason Orendorff <jason.orendorff at gmail.com>
> > I think it's a mistake for iterators not to be iterable.
> I agree, FWIW.
> I think I would go farther and suggest that _only_ iterators be
> iterable. That way, the RHS of a for-of is expected to be an iterator.
> In the worst case you end up having:
> var a = [1, 2, 3, 4]
> for (let x of values(a))
> instead of
> for (let x of a)
> which to my eye is better anyway. Making an "itertools"-like library
> difficult is a definite drawback of the current spec.
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss