Array.prototype.values breaks the web
brendan at mozilla.com
Tue Jul 23 10:11:58 PDT 2013
First, I think we should question adding plain-named methods to
Second, we should avoid cybercruddy names.
Third, we should be careful to break common pairings such as key and value.
Where does this leave us? I'm thinking close to wanting a functional
API, generic keys, values, entries (nee items), with any method
delegation using symbol-named @keys, @values, @entries.
Brandon Benvie wrote:
> On 7/23/2013 9:00 AM, Till Schneidereit wrote:
>> Given that, I don't see how we can expect to be able to land
>> Array.prototype.values in any meaningful timeframe and think dropping
>> it or changing the name should be considered.
> Bikeshed time! I submit "vals" and "items".
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
More information about the es-discuss