Security Demands Simplicity (was: Private Slots)
rossberg at google.com
Mon Jan 21 10:20:30 PST 2013
On 21 Jan 2013 17:33, "Tom Van Cutsem" <tomvc.be at gmail.com> wrote:
> So let's revisit the assumption: if a membrane does intercept and wrap
symbols, then two previously isolated pieces of code can never come to
share the same private symbol.
I'm not sure I understand what "wrapping a symbol" would actually mean. Are
you implying that proxies that target a symbol should actually be usable
_as_ a symbol?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss