Security Demands Simplicity (was: Private Slots)

Andreas Rossberg rossberg at google.com
Mon Jan 21 10:20:30 PST 2013


On 21 Jan 2013 17:33, "Tom Van Cutsem" <tomvc.be at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So let's revisit the assumption: if a membrane does intercept and wrap
symbols, then two previously isolated pieces of code can never come to
share the same private symbol.

I'm not sure I understand what "wrapping a symbol" would actually mean. Are
you implying that proxies that target a symbol should actually be usable
_as_ a symbol?

/Andreas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130121/05285753/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list