Security Demands Simplicity (was: Private Slots)

David Bruant bruant.d at
Sun Jan 20 17:44:45 PST 2013

Le 20/01/2013 21:53, Brendan Eich a écrit :
> Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
>> We we were going to talk about adding support for addition semantics 
>> to  classes we should start at the level of the object model.  Not 
>> with syntax. ES6 class syntax is good because it is defined in terms 
>> of the object model and more basic operations that are defined in the 
>> language.  You don't have to use class syntax to define a class 
>> equivalent. So, if we are going to introduce private object state the 
>> first step is to define how it works at the object model level.
> Cutting there to dodge the controversy over private-in-class based on 
> weak maps, to divide and conquer in the meta-discussion with David.
> Here I agree with you, and we have talked in the past of the perils of 
> "Scenario Solving" by adding just-so syntax with novel semantics, 
> which is not decomposed into orthogonal primitives. You saw that in a 
> past life (VB5, cough) and it made messes, even though the intentions 
> (serving developer problem-scenarios) were good.
I'm too new to the programming language world, so I don't have this 
context, but I'm curious. Do you have links or further explanations on 
this topic?



More information about the es-discuss mailing list