Polyfill for Maps and Sets

Rick Waldron waldron.rick at gmail.com
Fri Jan 18 10:17:44 PST 2013


As it turns out, my suggestion above had already been used (at least) once
before—Allen marked the destructuring proposal similarly. I've gone ahead
and updated the following:

http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:spread
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:rest_parameters
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:destructuring
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:weak_maps
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:simple_maps_and_sets
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:arrow_function_syntax
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:iterators
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:generators
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:generator_expressions
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:array_comprehensions
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:object_literals
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:maximally_minimal_classes
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:quasis


...to all reflect the same consistent message and linkage to the draft spec
and bugzilla pages.


Rick


On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Rick Waldron <waldron.rick at gmail.com>wrote:

> It doesn't seem reasonable to maintain two versions of the proposals as
> they become specifications.
>
> My first thought is that the simplest possible strategy is to update
> harmony proposal pages (on the wiki) with a line at the top that indicates
> that the proposal is now in the spec draft. This is low effort-cost to
> convey that everyone should be looking at the latest and greatest of each
> proposal as they become part of the ES6 draft revisions and progress
> towards finalization therein.
>
>
> Rick
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.com> wrote:
>
>> Thaddee Tyl wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Domenic Denicola
>>> <domenic at domenicdenicola.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dude, do you even read the spec?
>>>>
>>>> http://people.mozilla.org/~**jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-**15.14.5.4<http://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-15.14.5.4>
>>>>
>>>
>>> So this is just the wiki lacking some updates?
>>>
>>> http://wiki.ecmascript.org/**doku.php?id=harmony:simple_**maps_and_sets<http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:simple_maps_and_sets>
>>>
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> The wiki will lag the spec. I think it may pay to update the wiki, but
>> it's unlikely everyone will do this diligently (cc'ing rwaldron in case he
>> is motivated in this forEach case). So: always check Allen's latest draft.
>> It trumps the wiki, unless there's a bug (and it may be hard to know
>> without reading es-discuss or just asking here, cc'ing Allen).
>>
>> /be
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/**listinfo/es-discuss<https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130118/7ade5d9d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list