Security Demands Simplicity (was: Private Slots)

Kevin Smith khs4473 at gmail.com
Thu Jan 17 22:56:26 PST 2013


>
>
> Also, I don’t see why constructors need to use the “private.x” syntax
> whereas other methods get to use the free variable?
>

They wouldn't.  I was just trying to show the different ways to do the same
thing.


> ****
>
> ** **
>
> With these in mind I give the following fork:
> https://gist.github.com/4562796
>

Cool variation!  We still might want to use @ for (unique) symbols
though...  (?)  Also, "private" makes it clear we are dealing with a
separate (although intimately related) object.

{ Kevin }
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130118/be3b42c8/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list