bruant.d at gmail.com
Wed Jan 9 01:54:35 PST 2013
Le 08/01/2013 22:59, Erik Arvidsson a écrit :
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:46 PM, David Bruant <bruant.d at gmail.com
> <mailto:bruant.d at gmail.com>> wrote:
> One idea would be in the short term that implementations reliably
> *always* throw when trying to wrap non-ECMAScript objects and play
> with them as if they were legit browser objects. If the need
> becomes strong, implementation can later allow it (turning an
> error into a legit thing is usually not web breaking)
> At least in V8/JSC for WebKit DOM objects are real ECMAScript objects.
I meant "non-ECMAScript standard objects" when I wrote "non-ECMAScript
object". Sorry for the confusion.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss