direct_proxies "problem"

David Bruant bruant.d at gmail.com
Wed Jan 9 01:54:35 PST 2013


Le 08/01/2013 22:59, Erik Arvidsson a écrit :
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:46 PM, David Bruant <bruant.d at gmail.com 
> <mailto:bruant.d at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>     One idea would be in the short term that implementations reliably
>     *always* throw when trying to wrap non-ECMAScript objects and play
>     with them as if they were legit browser objects. If the need
>     becomes strong, implementation can later allow it (turning an
>     error into a legit thing is usually not web breaking)
>
>
> At least in V8/JSC for WebKit DOM objects are real ECMAScript objects.
>
I meant "non-ECMAScript standard objects" when I wrote "non-ECMAScript 
object". Sorry for the confusion.

David
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130109/82e5d758/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list