Minimal Module System Proposal

[Kevin Smith]

     Variant B: "module =" syntax
>
> Is that the variant you favor?


Yes, because:

- It aligns the URL visually to the right, which is consistent with the
import syntax.

- It makes it clear that we are binding an identifier to a (possibly
external) module, as opposed to importing bindings from a module.  I think
we should avoid overloaded terminology where "import" can also mean "load".

{ Kevin }
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130212/41c08877/attachment.html>