Minimal Module System Proposal
brendan at mozilla.com
Tue Feb 12 11:55:37 PST 2013
Kevin Smith wrote:
> Thanks, but let's not jump to any conclusions. I'm the champion of
> modules and wasn't even able to be a part of the discussion for
> family reasons. We can't make any judgment about the status of
> modules, or plans for reacting to the status of modules, before
> I've had a chance to be a part of the conversation.
> +1 and congrats (I'm slinging a babe right now ; )
> I'm confident that modules will make it - in my mind ES6 will fail if
> not. They are certainly more important than proxies and private
> names, and the sooner we coalesce around the syntax, the better
> everyone will feel. IMO, your previous proposal was almost right on.
> I think we need to have a knock-down-drag-out discussion about URL and
> loader semantics. ; )
Question about the linked wiki page rev:
Variant B: "module =" syntax
Is that the variant you favor?
More information about the es-discuss