Private symbols vs property attributes
Mark S. Miller
erights at google.com
Tue Feb 12 10:50:32 PST 2013
Yes. During a break at TC39 I sketched a very nice diagram of this to,
IIRC, Rick. I stupidly did not take a photo. When I find the time I'll try
to reproduce. In the meantime, hopefully the idea is clear enough.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 7:23 AM, David Bruant <bruant.d at gmail.com> wrote:
> Le 12/02/2013 16:06, Andreas Rossberg a écrit :
>
> On 10 February 2013 19:40, Mark Miller <erights at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> How does this interact with Proxies[1]? I know the answer probably starts
>>> with "whitelist", but let's spell it out in this context, and test it
>>> against the 8 membrane transparency cases previously discussed. If there
>>> are
>>> good answers for all of these, and if we can reuse enumerable: for this
>>> purpose as Brendan suggests, then I'm guardedly positive. I do not want
>>> to
>>> introduce a new attribute.
>>>
>> I must have missed the discussion of the "8 membrane transparency
>> cases". Do you have a pointer?
>>
> I think it is https://mail.mozilla.org/**pipermail/es-discuss/2013-**
> January/028481.html<https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2013-January/028481.html>
>
> David
>
--
Cheers,
--MarkM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130212/24d53904/attachment.html>
More information about the es-discuss
mailing list