Check out Dart's iterators

Oliver Hunt oliver at
Mon Feb 11 14:07:08 PST 2013

On Feb 11, 2013, at 1:58 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at> wrote:

> Oliver Hunt wrote:
>> So what you're saying is that people who attend in person meetings are able to veto proposals,
> No, I didn't say that. You are good at logic, I've seen your code. I know you grok P -> Q does not imply !P -> !Q.

It seems reasonable to interpret your statement as saying that vetos are  possible, but they aren't available to people unless they attend meetings.

Or are you saying that vetos aren't possible in the meetings?

>> People aren't required to attend TPAC to have input at least considered for inclusion in W3 specs.
> They don't get to throw unilaterla vetos there either.

I'm not actually sure where I threw a veto.

> /be

More information about the es-discuss mailing list