thoughts on ES6+ direction + modules

[Andrea Giammarchi]

I am over, I don't care about that specific survey indeed.

It was expected to have hard life here with these kind of thoughts ... just
consider this import stuff, node.js community, the fact devs here more than
once said: "let's do this way" and at the end it was done in another ...
let's just listen more from both sides.

I am sorry you took this personal, it was not, I swear.

br


On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Rick Waldron <waldron.rick at gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Andrea Giammarchi <
> andrea.giammarchi at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Rick, I have already updated the post and YES, TC39 **should** consider
>> what the rest of the world would like to do or the way has always done
>> something and expecting to do otherwise the one that's not respecting will
>> result to be TC39.
>>
>
> I don't follow.
>
>
>>
>> So, here, summarized my thoughts, re-explained in that post:
>> my point is that surveys should be public too because if 3 developers
>> cannot represent the entire community, neither can 300 behind the same
>> company, or just a couple.
>>
>
> I don't know who answered, I posted it in several high traffic IRC
> channels and Twitter where people re-tweeted.  Again, I just used the
> survey's results as a method of collecting a sample of data for my own
> benefit.
>
> Please stop acting like this survey was some kind of make or break, it
> wasn't—get over it.
>
>
>
>> There are many more of us out there, *I'd love to see the possibility to
>> participate every time a decision about an API should be made*!
>>
>
>> If you think that survey can help you, I completely agree that these
>> should be considered ... developers are those that will use the language,
>> don't make JavaScript as hostile as the DOM could have been in the past,
>> Thank you and everyone else.
>>
>
> You lost me.
>
>
>
> Rick
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130211/d36f4f05/attachment.html>