thoughts on ES6+ direction + modules
Rick Waldron
waldron.rick at gmail.com
Mon Feb 11 11:13:03 PST 2013
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Andrea Giammarchi <
andrea.giammarchi at gmail.com> wrote:
> Rick, I have already updated the post and YES, TC39 **should** consider
> what the rest of the world would like to do or the way has always done
> something and expecting to do otherwise the one that's not respecting will
> result to be TC39.
>
I don't follow.
>
> So, here, summarized my thoughts, re-explained in that post:
> my point is that surveys should be public too because if 3 developers
> cannot represent the entire community, neither can 300 behind the same
> company, or just a couple.
>
I don't know who answered, I posted it in several high traffic IRC channels
and Twitter where people re-tweeted. Again, I just used the survey's
results as a method of collecting a sample of data for my own benefit.
Please stop acting like this survey was some kind of make or break, it
wasn't—get over it.
> There are many more of us out there, *I'd love to see the possibility to
> participate every time a decision about an API should be made*!
>
> If you think that survey can help you, I completely agree that these
> should be considered ... developers are those that will use the language,
> don't make JavaScript as hostile as the DOM could have been in the past,
> Thank you and everyone else.
>
You lost me.
Rick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130211/c8013641/attachment.html>
More information about the es-discuss
mailing list