thoughts on ES6+ direction + modules

Andrea Giammarchi andrea.giammarchi at gmail.com
Mon Feb 11 10:20:29 PST 2013


I'll change/fix/explain that if you think is respectful, I still never had
an answer about that survey (who committed, and who decided that was the
way to do the survey).



On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Rick Waldron <waldron.rick at gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Andrea Giammarchi <
> andrea.giammarchi at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> snip
>>
>
>
>> involve as many developers as possible, rather than provide *already
>> decided internal decisions based in already decided internal pools* nobody
>> ever heard about out there (public pools or it didn't happen)
>>
>
> I wish you hadn't posted this, it implies something that's not true and
> reads as incredibly disrespectful. All input, from all sources, is given a
> fair consideration. It stands to reason that well articulated, thoughtful
> and well researched input is given more consideration—a fact that's backed
> by irrefutable, publicly documented evidence.
>
> Rick
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130211/eb4acd66/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list