Minimal Module System Proposal

Kevin Smith khs4473 at
Thu Feb 7 18:25:36 PST 2013

> Thanks, but let's not jump to any conclusions. I'm the champion of modules
> and wasn't even able to be a part of the discussion for family reasons. We
> can't make any judgment about the status of modules, or plans for reacting
> to the status of modules, before I've had a chance to be a part of the
> conversation.
 +1 and congrats (I'm slinging a babe right now ; )

I'm confident that modules will make it - in my mind ES6 will fail if not.
 They are certainly more important than proxies and private names, and the
sooner we coalesce around the syntax, the better everyone will feel.  IMO,
your previous proposal was almost right on.  e.g.

I think we need to have a knock-down-drag-out discussion about URL and
loader semantics.  ; )

{ Kevin }
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list