Private symbols auto-unwrapping proxies (was: Security Demands Simplicity (was: Private Slots))
Tom Van Cutsem
tomvc.be at gmail.com
Mon Feb 4 11:30:48 PST 2013
2013/1/28 Tom Van Cutsem <tomvc.be at gmail.com>
> I just wrote up a strawman on the wiki to summarize the recent debates
> about the interaction between proxies and private symbols:
>
> http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:proxy_symbol_decoupled
>
> The page actually lists two proposals, out of which I prefer the second
> one.
>
I just updated the above wiki page with a brief summary of follow-up
discussions on-list and off-list.
There are pros and cons either way. We'll have to make compromises.
There's also the third alternative: stick with the current
design (whitelist to trap known private symbols + unknownPrivateSymbol trap
to implement a forwarding policy for unknown private symbols).
Cheers,
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130204/ae65c172/attachment.html>
More information about the es-discuss
mailing list