Removal of NoIn grammar productions and for-loop parsing

Brendan Eich brendan at
Sat Aug 31 21:21:35 PDT 2013

Allen, are you doing this some other way? Static semantics can't do it, 
we need parametric productions or else ye olde NoIn splitting.

> André Bargull <mailto:andre.bargull at>
> August 31, 2013 4:21 AM
> The NoIn grammar productions have been removed in rev17. Does this 
> mean that `for (a in b;;);` is now a valid (C-style) for-loop instead 
> of a SyntaxError?
> Thanks,
> André
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at

More information about the es-discuss mailing list