Should the "length" property of bound functions be configurable

Rick Waldron waldron.rick at gmail.com
Fri Aug 30 15:24:51 PDT 2013


On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Brandon Benvie <bbenvie at mozilla.com> wrote:

> Part of the function name proposal submitted would make "name" writable
> but not configurable, which is the inverse of the current spec for "length"
> being configurable but not writable. Seems there needs to be some
> discussion on what attributes should be where.
>
>
Relevant:
https://github.com/rwaldron/tc39-notes/blob/master/es6/2013-07/july-25.md#513-which-existing-built-in-properties-that-are-read-onlynon-configurable-do-we-want-to-make-read-onlyconfigurable
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130830/2bd8f6e4/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list