Killing `Promise.fulfill`

Mark S. Miller erights at google.com
Wed Aug 21 18:03:50 PDT 2013


Meta summary: AFAICT, Tab and I are in 100% agreement on all issues either
of us has raised!

An non-meta summary will take more time ;).


On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.com> wrote:

> Mark S. Miller wrote:
>
>>
>>     Cool.  That means we get a decent naming precedent for the monad ops,
>>     and consistency with Array.of (which also happens to be a monadic
>>     lifter, if you limit yourself to calling it with only a single
>>     argument).
>>
>>
>> I agree that this naming analogy is a good thing. I raise my approval
>> magnitude to +1 ;).
>>
>
> Bart: Are we there yet?
> Homer: Just a little further...
> Bart: Are we there yet?
> Homer: Just a little further...
> etc.
>
> Can someone summarize for those of us who accidentally skipped a bunch of
> unread messages here? It sounds good from the last post ;-).
>
> /be
>



-- 
    Cheers,
    --MarkM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130821/47dc072f/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list