Some Typed Objects Confusion

Dmitry Lomov dslomov at chromium.org
Wed Aug 21 12:26:44 PDT 2013


Hmm really? I am not sure - how this reconciles with existing Object and
String?
Even if this is imported from a module, the clashing will be unfortunate.

Dmitry


On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:02 PM, David Herman <dherman at mozilla.com> wrote:

> Any, String and Object should still be uppercase. The naming convention
> is: value types lowercase, reference types uppercase.
>
> Dave
>
> On Aug 21, 2013, at 4:21 AM, Dmitry Lomov <dslomov at chromium.org> wrote:
>
> > string, boolean, object and any are all lowercase (we should fix the
> wiki)
> >
> > FWIW, I am already working on a new version of polyfill. It is fully ES5.
> > Here is a pull request: https://github.com/dherman/structs.js/pull/12 -
> I'll merge it soon, and work more to cover everything in the proposal.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dmitry
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Andrea Giammarchi <
> andrea.giammarchi at gmail.com> wrote:
> > sorry, point 3 was actually the question about point 2
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Andrea Giammarchi <
> andrea.giammarchi at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Uhm, just a couple of extra question about that page if/when you have
> time:
> >       • string and boolean are mentioned, but nowhere in your
> `struct.js` prolyfill code. Will string and boolean be accepted?
> >       • `Object` and `Any` are mentioned, but exported as object and any
> in your `struct.js` prolyfill example. W
> >       • Which is the right way?
> > The reason I am asking is to be able to create code that does absolutely
> nothing (for performance reason) but will look like the real thing so I can
> start experimenting with static structures and possibly a develop VS
> production version of an ES3 to ES5 compatible polyfill since I believe
> your code won't run anywhere except in SpiderMonkey (which is OK but it's
> not suitable for a lightweight migration to "structure like" logic)
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Andrea Giammarchi <
> andrea.giammarchi at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Awesome, thanks!
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:12 PM, David Herman <dherman at mozilla.com>
> wrote:
> > On Aug 20, 2013, at 1:31 PM, Andrea Giammarchi <
> andrea.giammarchi at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > [In this page](
> http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:typed_objects), and in the
> latest meeting note too, I can read both uint8 and Uint8, as example.
> >
> > Bug. Fixed, thanks.
> >
> > > **The Question**
> > > How is `new StructType({x:Uint32, y:Uint32})` supposes to understand
> the type? `instanceof Uint32` or `typeof v === "uint32"` or ... both in
> case of `boolean` and `string` ?
> >
> > Neither. It tells you that the x and y fields have typeof 'number' and
> that their values are constrained to be integers in the range [0, 2^32).
> >
> > > A bonus question would be: does anybody know when this stuff is
> planned to go out? Not a single beta/alpha channel is exposing anything at
> all so far.
> >
> > Nikhil Marathe and Niko Matsakis are actively working on the
> implementation for SpiderMonkey:
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=578700
> >
> > Dmitriy Lomov is actively working on updating the prollyfill to match
> the current API:
> >
> >     https://github.com/dherman/structs.js
> >     https://github.com/dherman/structs.js/pull/12
> >
> > Not sure if anyone on the V8 team (which includes Dmitriy) has started
> implementation but I believe they're interested. Right now Dmitriy is
> focused on the prollyfill and spec.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > es-discuss mailing list
> > es-discuss at mozilla.org
> > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
> >
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20130821/083fbb55/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list